Wilmington Blue Rocks
WIL · South Atlantic League South Atlantic League North · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 25 | 27 | −2 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 22.2 | 22.7 | −0.5 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 3979 | 4424 | −445 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 91.7% | 94.6% | −2.9% | 24th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 1st of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 37 | 35 | +1 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 69.0% | 63.9% | +5.1% | 4th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 27 | 19 | +7 | 29th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -17 | 0 | −17 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.14 | 0.00 | −0.14 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 4.93 | 5.54 | −0.60 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.08 | 5.53 | −0.45 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .500 | .500 | — | 14th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .487 | .501 | −.014 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 1.6 | -0.1 | +1.7 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .528 | .497 | +.031 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .481 | .501 | −.020 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .625 | .514 | +.111 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .576 | .520 | +.056 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .426 | .480 | −.054 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .533 | .510 | +.023 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 6 | 6 | — | 16th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the A+ clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".