Add SportsStats to your home screen

Kansas City Royals logo

Kansas City Royals

KC · AL Central · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 763 738 +24 17th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 16.9% 15.5% +1.4% 17th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -2.5 -2.4 −0.1 16th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 4 5 −1 8th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 1697 859 +837 28th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 34.9% 17.4% +17.5% 28th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 5.1 3.8 +1.4 4th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 8.8 8.7 +0.1 13th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 11.6 12.1 −0.5 17th of 30
Total position-player WAR 13.2 14.4 −1.2 19th of 30
Total pitching WAR 2.7 11.4 −8.7 28th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 66.7% 63.1% +3.6% 10th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.34 0.41 −0.07 26th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 1 3 −2 26th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 1 0 2nd of 30
Hitters used 19 22 −3 24th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 28.5 28.4 +0.1 15th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 879 1085 −206 17th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 19.5% 22.9% −3.4% 16th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 651 300 +350 5th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 29 28 14th of 30
Rotation WAR 7.3 10.0 −2.7 25th of 30
Bullpen WAR -1.9 3.8 −5.7 29th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 5.8 7.0 −1.2 24th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 71.0% 70.9% 15th of 30
Quality starts 51 43 +7 7th of 30
Blown saves 24 19 +4 24th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential -112 0 −112 28th of 30
Run differential per game -0.93 0.00 −0.93 28th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.14 4.48 −0.34 23rd of 30
Runs allowed per game 5.07 4.48 +0.59 27th of 30
Winning percentage .405 .500 −.095 27th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .409 .502 −.092 29th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation -0.5 -0.2 −0.3 15th of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .432 .499 −.067 24th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .333 .499 −.166 28th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .444 .515 −.071 19th of 30
Home winning percentage .492 .525 −.033 19th of 30
Road winning percentage .323 .475 −.152 30th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .450 .499 −.049 23rd of 30
Longest winning streak 5 6 −1 16th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 121 120 1st of 30
Team Plate Appearances 4529 4542 −13 16th of 30
Team At Bats 4053 4034 +18 13th of 30
Team Runs 501 538 −37 23rd of 30
Team Hits 989 982 +6 14th of 30
Team Doubles 218 186 +31 2nd of 30
Team Triples 16 16 15th of 30
Team Home Runs 122 138 −16 23rd of 30
Team Runs Batted In 477 514 −37 24th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 94 81 +12 9th of 30
Team Walks 374 405 −31 25th of 30
Team Strikeouts 955 1004 −49 7th of 30
Team Walk Rate 8.3% 8.9% −0.6% 25th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 21.1% 22.1% −1.0% 7th of 30
Team Batting Average .244 .243 +.001 12th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .312 .318 −.006 22nd of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .396 .401 −.005 19th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .708 .719 −.011 21st of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 49 60 −11 27th of 30
Team Losses 72 60 +11 27th of 30
Team Saves 29 31 −2 20th of 30
Team Games 121 120 1st of 30
Team Games Started 121 120 1st of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1063.1 1064.2 −1.1 16th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.8 8.9 −0.1 21st of 30
Team Strikeouts 895 1004 −109 28th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 7.6 8.5 −0.9 27th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 3.8 3.4 +0.4 24th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 4.84 4.16 +0.68 28th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".