Reno Aces
RNO · Pacific Coast League Pacific Coast League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 31 | 26 | +4 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 25.5 | 26.9 | −1.4 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2288 | 1454 | +833 | 4th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 55.1% | 34.6% | +20.5% | 4th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 12 | 76 | −64 | 14th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 31 | 36 | −5 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 70.0% | 71.9% | −1.9% | 16th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 24 | 18 | +5 | 25th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -36 | 0 | −36 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.33 | 0.00 | −0.33 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.69 | 5.41 | +0.28 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.03 | 5.41 | +0.62 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .454 | .500 | −.046 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .474 | .501 | −.027 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -2.2 | -0.1 | −2.1 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .500 | .503 | −.003 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .514 | .500 | +.014 | 12th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .273 | .501 | −.228 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .491 | .519 | −.028 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .412 | .481 | −.069 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .450 | .502 | −.052 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 5 | −1 | 24th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".