Puebla Pericos
PUE · Mexican League Mexican League Hidalgo · 2019Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 19 | 32 | −13 | 37th of 44 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 29.6 | 28.1 | +1.4 | 11th of 44 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 596 | 1534 | −938 | 38th of 44 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 12.6% | 29.4% | −16.8% | 38th of 44 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 565 | 387 | +177 | 14th of 44 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 35 | 32 | +2 | 16th of 44 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 61.6% | 71.3% | −9.7% | 42nd of 44 |
|
| Blown saves | 23 | 19 | +3 | 35th of 44 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -14 | 0 | −13 | 27th of 44 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.18 | -0.01 | −0.17 | 28th of 44 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.68 | 5.68 | — | 22nd of 44 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.87 | 5.69 | +0.18 | 30th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage | .440 | .500 | −.060 | 32nd of 44 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .485 | .500 | −.015 | 28th of 44 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -3.4 | -0.0 | −3.4 | 42nd of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .500 | .504 | −.004 | 19th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .500 | .499 | +.001 | 20th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .500 | .507 | −.007 | 18th of 44 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .488 | .519 | −.031 | 31st of 44 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .382 | .483 | −.101 | 36th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .353 | .506 | −.154 | 38th of 41 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 23rd of 44 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".