Oklahoma City Comets
OKC · Pacific Coast League Pacific Coast League East · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 23 | 28 | −5 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 27.2 | 26.9 | +0.3 | 13th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1506 | 1599 | −93 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 33.9% | 35.1% | −1.3% | 14th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 72 | 80 | −8 | 12th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 37 | 39 | −2 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 71.6% | 72.4% | −0.8% | 13th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 22 | 20 | +1 | 19th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 139 | 0 | +139 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 1.24 | 0.00 | +1.24 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.45 | 5.43 | +1.02 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.21 | 5.43 | −0.22 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .563 | .500 | +.063 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .597 | .501 | +.096 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -3.9 | -0.1 | −3.8 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .484 | .503 | −.019 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .711 | .500 | +.211 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .333 | .505 | −.172 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .582 | .518 | +.064 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .544 | .482 | +.062 | 6th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .620 | .502 | +.118 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 9 | 5 | +3 | 2nd of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".