Mexico Diablos Rojos
MEX · Mexican League Mexican League Madero · 2019Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 18 | 32 | −14 | 40th of 44 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 29.6 | 28.1 | +1.5 | 10th of 44 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 722 | 1534 | −812 | 35th of 44 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 15.9% | 29.4% | −13.5% | 35th of 44 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 634 | 387 | +246 | 13th of 44 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 23 | 32 | −9 | 38th of 44 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 69.4% | 71.3% | −1.9% | 25th of 44 |
|
| Blown saves | 22 | 19 | +2 | 30th of 44 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 77 | 0 | +77 | 12th of 44 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.99 | -0.01 | +1.00 | 10th of 44 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.41 | 5.68 | +0.73 | 9th of 44 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.42 | 5.69 | −0.27 | 19th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage | .577 | .500 | +.077 | 7th of 44 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .576 | .500 | +.076 | 12th of 44 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 0.1 | -0.0 | +0.1 | 24th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .667 | .504 | +.163 | 2nd of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .600 | .499 | +.101 | 14th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .500 | .507 | −.007 | 18th of 44 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .581 | .519 | +.062 | 12th of 44 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .571 | .483 | +.088 | 10th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .529 | .506 | +.022 | 20th of 41 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 23rd of 44 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".