Indianapolis Indians
IND · International League International League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 32 | 30 | +1 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 25.8 | 26.9 | −1.1 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1986 | 1868 | +117 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 36.5% | 35.2% | +1.4% | 13th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 90 | −90 | 16th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 32 | 42 | −10 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 89.0% | 73.3% | +15.6% | 1st of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 17 | 23 | −6 | 2nd of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 45 | 0 | +45 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.34 | 0.00 | +0.34 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.08 | 5.37 | −0.29 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.73 | 5.37 | −0.64 | 4th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .496 | .500 | −.004 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .532 | .501 | +.031 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -4.7 | -0.1 | −4.6 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .613 | .503 | +.110 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .605 | .501 | +.104 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .444 | .509 | −.065 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .515 | .514 | +.001 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .476 | .486 | −.010 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .496 | .501 | −.005 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 6 | 6 | — | 12th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".