Greeneville Astros
GRN · Appalachian League Appalachian League West · 2018Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 13 | 19 | −6 | 95th of 98 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 20.2 | 19.4 | +0.8 | 26th of 98 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1800 | 2465 | −665 | 92nd of 98 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.7% | +0.3% | 1st of 98 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 2nd of 98 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 25 | 22 | +2 | 24th of 98 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 62.7% | 65.7% | −3.0% | 60th of 98 |
|
| Blown saves | 12 | 9 | +2 | 69th of 98 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -74 | 0 | −74 | 83rd of 98 |
|
| Run differential per game | -1.09 | -0.00 | −1.09 | 82nd of 98 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.15 | 4.99 | +0.16 | 42nd of 98 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.24 | 4.99 | +1.25 | 89th of 98 |
|
| Winning percentage | .412 | .500 | −.088 | 78th of 98 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .413 | .500 | −.087 | 78th of 98 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -0.1 | -0.0 | −0.1 | 49th of 98 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .588 | .504 | +.084 | 20th of 98 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .381 | .494 | −.113 | 74th of 98 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .600 | .533 | +.067 | 30th of 94 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .364 | .528 | −.164 | 84th of 98 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .457 | .472 | −.015 | 47th of 98 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .421 | .501 | −.080 | 55th of 82 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 5 | −1 | 56th of 98 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".