FCL Pirates Gold
F-PIG · Florida Complex League Florida Complex League South · 2021Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 20 | 23 | −3 | 38th of 82 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 20.6 | 19.3 | +1.4 | 13th of 82 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1550 | 1932 | −382 | 77th of 82 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 99.4% | 99.6% | −0.2% | 64th of 82 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 2nd of 82 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 18 | 25 | −7 | 58th of 82 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 72.6% | 66.6% | +6.0% | 22nd of 82 |
|
| Blown saves | 5 | 8 | −3 | 9th of 82 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 94 | 0 | +94 | 5th of 82 |
|
| Run differential per game | 2.09 | -0.01 | +2.10 | 4th of 82 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.96 | 4.96 | +1.00 | 11th of 82 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 3.87 | 4.98 | −1.11 | 10th of 82 |
|
| Winning percentage | .682 | .499 | +.183 | 5th of 82 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .688 | .498 | +.190 | 4th of 82 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -0.3 | 0.0 | −0.3 | 46th of 82 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .600 | .494 | +.106 | 16th of 82 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .909 | .508 | +.401 | 2nd of 82 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .509 | −.509 | 50th of 66 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .636 | .527 | +.109 | 22nd of 82 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .727 | .470 | +.257 | 3rd of 82 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .682 | .494 | +.188 | 10th of 68 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 7 | 5 | +1 | 14th of 82 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".