Durham Bulls
DUR · International League International League East · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 33 | 30 | +2 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 27.0 | 26.9 | +0.1 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1680 | 1885 | −205 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 30.0% | 35.2% | −5.2% | 21st of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 91 | −91 | 16th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 41 | 42 | −1 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 78.4% | 73.3% | +5.1% | 6th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 19 | 24 | −5 | 8th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -107 | 0 | −107 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.82 | 0.00 | −0.82 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 4.55 | 5.38 | −0.83 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.37 | 5.38 | −0.01 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .462 | .500 | −.038 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .424 | .501 | −.077 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 4.9 | -0.1 | +5.0 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .568 | .503 | +.065 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .400 | .501 | −.101 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .500 | .510 | −.010 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .412 | .514 | −.102 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .516 | .486 | +.030 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .390 | .501 | −.111 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 6 | −1 | 18th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".