DSL Royals Fortuna
D-ROF · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League North · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 16 | 20 | −4 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.2 | 18.9 | −0.7 | 53rd of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1903 | 2137 | −234 | 62nd of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 23 | 26 | −3 | 50th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 54.7% | 63.4% | −8.7% | 68th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 8 | 10 | −2 | 20th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 26 | 0 | +26 | 32nd of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.48 | -0.00 | +0.48 | 32nd of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.69 | 6.20 | −0.51 | 54th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.20 | 6.20 | −1.00 | 17th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .667 | .500 | +.167 | 5th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .540 | .503 | +.037 | 31st of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 6.8 | -0.2 | +7.0 | 1st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .750 | .496 | +.254 | 3rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .533 | .500 | +.033 | 33rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .525 | −.525 | 42nd of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .630 | .557 | +.073 | 29th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .704 | .443 | +.261 | 4th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .645 | .501 | +.144 | 15th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 8 | 5 | +2 | 9th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".