DSL Rangers Red
D-RNR · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League East · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 21 | 20 | — | 31st of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.3 | 18.9 | −0.5 | 45th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2338 | 1995 | +342 | 9th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 31 | 26 | +4 | 21st of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 59.1% | 62.6% | −3.4% | 52nd of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 11 | 9 | +1 | 54th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -11 | 0 | −11 | 50th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.22 | -0.00 | −0.22 | 51st of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 8.12 | 6.20 | +1.92 | 2nd of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 8.33 | 6.20 | +2.13 | 78th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .471 | .500 | −.029 | 46th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .488 | .502 | −.014 | 49th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -0.9 | -0.1 | −0.8 | 51st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .333 | .493 | −.160 | 66th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .500 | .503 | −.003 | 40th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .524 | −.524 | 41st of 59 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .600 | .558 | +.042 | 31st of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .346 | .442 | −.096 | 58th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .519 | .501 | +.018 | 41st of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 27th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".