DSL Nationals
D-NAT · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League South · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 17 | 20 | −3 | 47th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.3 | 18.9 | −0.5 | 45th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1811 | 2137 | −326 | 73rd of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 21 | 26 | −5 | 62nd of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 69.1% | 63.4% | +5.7% | 18th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 10 | 10 | — | 36th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -119 | 0 | −119 | 73rd of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -2.20 | -0.00 | −2.20 | 76th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.00 | 6.20 | −1.20 | 74th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 7.20 | 6.20 | +1.00 | 64th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .259 | .500 | −.241 | 79th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .339 | .503 | −.164 | 74th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -4.3 | -0.2 | −4.1 | 76th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .462 | .496 | −.034 | 49th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .200 | .500 | −.300 | 74th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .525 | +.475 | 1st of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .308 | .557 | −.249 | 79th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .214 | .443 | −.229 | 76th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .313 | .501 | −.188 | 70th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 3 | 5 | −2 | 66th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".