DSL Mets Orange
D-MEO · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League South · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 21 | 20 | — | 32nd of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.0 | 18.9 | −0.9 | 64th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 3027 | 2137 | +889 | 2nd of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 29 | 26 | +2 | 26th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 50.0% | 63.4% | −13.4% | 78th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 9 | 10 | −1 | 31st of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 12 | 0 | +12 | 37th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.21 | -0.00 | +0.21 | 37th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.30 | 6.20 | −0.90 | 68th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.09 | 6.20 | −1.11 | 13th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .518 | .500 | +.018 | 40th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .519 | .503 | +.016 | 37th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -0.1 | -0.2 | +0.1 | 36th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .471 | .495 | −.024 | 45th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .550 | .501 | +.049 | 32nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .500 | .525 | −.025 | 30th of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .500 | .557 | −.057 | 53rd of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .536 | .442 | +.094 | 25th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .438 | .501 | −.063 | 54th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 5 | −1 | 47th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".