DSL Marlins
D-MRL · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Southeast · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 17 | 19 | −2 | 37th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.1 | 18.9 | −0.8 | 60th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1576 | 1789 | −213 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 18 | 25 | −7 | 68th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 71.9% | 61.4% | +10.5% | 13th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 6 | 8 | −2 | 17th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 60 | 0 | +60 | 16th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 1.36 | -0.00 | +1.36 | 15th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 7.14 | 6.25 | +0.89 | 16th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.77 | 6.25 | −0.48 | 34th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .568 | .500 | +.068 | 27th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .596 | .502 | +.094 | 16th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -1.2 | -0.1 | −1.1 | 57th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .385 | .493 | −.108 | 61st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .619 | .503 | +.116 | 27th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .527 | +.473 | 1st of 58 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .545 | .559 | −.014 | 43rd of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .591 | .440 | +.151 | 14th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .600 | .501 | +.099 | 24th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 7 | 5 | +2 | 13th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".