DSL LAD Mega
D-LAM · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Northwest · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 15 | 20 | −5 | 71st of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.7 | 18.9 | −0.2 | 36th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1957 | 2137 | −180 | 60th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 22 | 26 | −4 | 57th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 64.6% | 63.4% | +1.2% | 31st of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 14 | 10 | +3 | 66th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -55 | 0 | −55 | 60th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -1.04 | -0.00 | −1.04 | 60th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.64 | 6.20 | +0.44 | 29th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 7.68 | 6.20 | +1.48 | 75th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .423 | .500 | −.077 | 59th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .434 | .503 | −.069 | 60th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -0.6 | -0.2 | −0.4 | 45th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .429 | .496 | −.066 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .400 | .500 | −.100 | 57th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .525 | −.525 | 42nd of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .500 | .557 | −.057 | 52nd of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .346 | .443 | −.097 | 57th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .387 | .501 | −.114 | 61st of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 3 | 5 | −2 | 65th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".