DSL Giants Orange
D-GIO · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Southwest · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 14 | 19 | −5 | 69th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 19.0 | 18.9 | +0.1 | 33rd of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1532 | 1789 | −257 | 68th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 21 | 25 | −4 | 45th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 49.7% | 61.4% | −11.6% | 74th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 10 | 8 | +1 | 54th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 11 | 0 | +11 | 38th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.24 | -0.00 | +0.24 | 38th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.40 | 6.25 | −0.85 | 66th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.16 | 6.25 | −1.09 | 14th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .556 | .500 | +.056 | 33rd of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .521 | .502 | +.019 | 38th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 1.6 | -0.1 | +1.7 | 15th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .571 | .493 | +.078 | 25th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .556 | .503 | +.053 | 34th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .527 | +.473 | 1st of 58 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .727 | .559 | +.168 | 6th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .391 | .440 | −.049 | 52nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .680 | .501 | +.179 | 7th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 26th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".