DSL Colorado
D-COL · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Southeast · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 18 | 20 | −2 | 38th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.0 | 18.9 | −0.9 | 65th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2482 | 1910 | +571 | 2nd of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 23 | 25 | −2 | 41st of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 72.0% | 62.2% | +9.7% | 13th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 11 | 8 | +2 | 59th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 116 | 0 | +116 | 6th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 2.37 | -0.00 | +2.37 | 4th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 7.82 | 6.22 | +1.60 | 6th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.45 | 6.23 | −0.78 | 28th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .667 | .500 | +.167 | 5th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .659 | .502 | +.156 | 6th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 0.4 | -0.1 | +0.5 | 33rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .273 | .492 | −.219 | 73rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .867 | .503 | +.364 | 2nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .667 | .533 | +.134 | 24th of 58 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .750 | .560 | +.190 | 4th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .583 | .439 | +.144 | 16th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .621 | .501 | +.120 | 17th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 9 | 5 | +3 | 7th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".