Brooklyn Cyclones
BRK · South Atlantic League South Atlantic League North · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 36 | 27 | +8 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 23.0 | 22.7 | +0.3 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 4790 | 4424 | +365 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 92.3% | 94.6% | −2.3% | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 1st of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 48 | 35 | +12 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 68.3% | 63.9% | +4.4% | 6th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 18 | 19 | −1 | 11th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 7 | 0 | +7 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.06 | 0.00 | +0.06 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 4.66 | 5.54 | −0.88 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.60 | 5.53 | −0.93 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .445 | .500 | −.055 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .506 | .501 | +.005 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -7.2 | -0.1 | −7.1 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .313 | .497 | −.184 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .579 | .501 | +.078 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .300 | .514 | −.214 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .508 | .520 | −.012 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .383 | .480 | −.097 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .453 | .510 | −.057 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 6 | −1 | 26th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the A+ clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".