Bristol White Sox
BRS · Appalachian League Appalachian League West · 2018Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 20 | 19 | — | 29th of 98 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 21.1 | 19.4 | +1.7 | 7th of 98 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2819 | 2465 | +353 | 18th of 98 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.7% | +0.3% | 1st of 98 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 2nd of 98 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 24 | 22 | +1 | 31st of 98 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 54.2% | 65.7% | −11.5% | 88th of 98 |
|
| Blown saves | 10 | 9 | — | 46th of 98 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -78 | 0 | −78 | 84th of 98 |
|
| Run differential per game | -1.15 | -0.00 | −1.15 | 84th of 98 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.35 | 4.99 | +0.36 | 31st of 98 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.50 | 4.99 | +1.51 | 92nd of 98 |
|
| Winning percentage | .456 | .500 | −.044 | 66th of 98 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .412 | .500 | −.088 | 79th of 98 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 3.0 | -0.0 | +3.0 | 10th of 98 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .583 | .504 | +.080 | 22nd of 98 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .286 | .494 | −.208 | 82nd of 98 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .286 | .533 | −.247 | 81st of 94 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .515 | .528 | −.012 | 53rd of 98 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .400 | .472 | −.072 | 70th of 98 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .417 | .501 | −.084 | 57th of 82 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 3 | 5 | −2 | 79th of 98 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".