Add SportsStats to your home screen

Minnesota Twins

MIN · AL Central · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 369 961 −592 5th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 6.1% 15.0% −8.9% 5th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -1.7 -2.9 +1.2 8th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 2 6 −4 1st of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 586 1111 −525 6th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 8.7% 16.5% −7.8% 6th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 3.0 4.9 −1.9 27th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 8.4 11.4 −3.0 28th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 13.5 15.8 −2.3 24th of 30
Total position-player WAR 19.2 19.4 −0.2 16th of 30
Total pitching WAR 13.3 15.1 −1.8 20th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 43.8% 62.3% −18.6% 29th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.34 0.45 −0.11 30th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 6 4 +1 3rd of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 0 1 −1 25th of 30
Hitters used 23 24 −1 19th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 28.7 28.3 +0.4 13th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 1552 1557 −5 13th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 25.6% 24.4% +1.2% 13th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 0 397 −397 19th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 31 32 −1 18th of 30
Rotation WAR 11.4 13.1 −1.7 19th of 30
Bullpen WAR 6.8 6.5 +0.3 13th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 7.3 8.8 −1.5 21st of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 61.6% 71.5% −9.9% 28th of 30
Quality starts 55 56 −1 16th of 30
Blown saves 26 26 — 14th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential -58 0 −58 23rd of 30
Run differential per game -0.36 0.00 −0.36 23rd of 30
Runs scored per game 4.56 4.48 +0.08 10th of 30
Runs allowed per game 4.92 4.48 +0.44 25th of 30
Winning percentage .475 .500 −.025 19th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .465 .502 −.037 23rd of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation 1.7 -0.3 +2.0 11th of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .439 .499 −.060 23rd of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .429 .500 −.071 24th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .455 .511 −.056 22nd of 30
Home winning percentage .519 .528 −.010 15th of 30
Road winning percentage .432 .472 −.040 21st of 30
Winning percentage within the division .481 .500 −.019 17th of 30
Longest winning streak 4 6 −2 24th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 162 161 — 1st of 30
Team Plate Appearances 6127 6128 −1 11th of 30
Team At Bats 5468 5444 +23 10th of 30
Team Runs 739 725 +13 9th of 30
Team Hits 1337 1328 +8 15th of 30
Team Doubles 256 249 +6 12th of 30
Team Triples 26 22 +3 6th of 30
Team Home Runs 187 185 +1 12th of 30
Team Runs Batted In 707 693 +13 9th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 91 109 −18 20th of 30
Team Walks 507 544 −37 26th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1297 1356 −59 7th of 30
Team Walk Rate 8.3% 8.9% −0.6% 25th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 21.2% 22.1% −0.9% 8th of 30
Team Batting Average .245 .244 +.001 13th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .317 .318 −.001 14th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .403 .400 +.003 10th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .720 .719 +.001 11th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 77 80 −3 19th of 30
Team Losses 85 80 +4 19th of 30
Team Saves 45 41 +3 12th of 30
Team Blown Saves 21 23 −2 11th of 30
Team Games 162 161 — 1st of 30
Team Games Started 162 161 — 1st of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1435.2 1435.2 — 19th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.9 8.9 — 2nd of 30
Team Strikeouts 1381 1356 +24 13th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 8.7 8.5 +0.2 12th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 3.6 3.4 +0.2 20th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 4.56 4.17 +0.39 25th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".