Add SportsStats to your home screen

Miami Marlins

MIA · NL East · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 688 762 −74 13th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 14.3% 15.1% −0.9% 13th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -2.4 -2.5 +0.1 14th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 5 5 — 9th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 406 943 −537 4th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 8.5% 17.9% −9.3% 4th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 4.5 3.9 +0.6 5th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 9.1 9.0 +0.1 14th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 12.3 12.7 −0.4 16th of 30
Total position-player WAR 15.9 15.1 +0.8 11th of 30
Total pitching WAR 13.0 11.9 +1.1 14th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 57.2% 63.0% −5.8% 19th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.41 0.42 −0.01 17th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 3 3 — 15th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 1 0 — 3rd of 30
Hitters used 19 22 −3 26th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 26.3 28.4 −2.1 27th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 1714 1161 +552 7th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 35.6% 23.1% +12.5% 6th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 0 316 −316 19th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 24 29 −5 26th of 30
Rotation WAR 10.3 10.4 −0.1 16th of 30
Bullpen WAR 3.9 4.0 −0.1 15th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 7.8 7.4 +0.4 12th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 75.3% 70.9% +4.4% 8th of 30
Quality starts 43 45 −2 18th of 30
Blown saves 19 20 −1 13th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential 14 0 +14 13th of 30
Run differential per game 0.11 0.00 +0.11 13th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.38 4.48 −0.10 18th of 30
Runs allowed per game 4.27 4.48 −0.21 11th of 30
Winning percentage .500 .500 — 14th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .512 .501 +.011 12th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation -1.5 -0.1 −1.4 18th of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .533 .500 +.033 11th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .486 .499 −.013 15th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .333 .512 −.179 27th of 30
Home winning percentage .603 .524 +.079 5th of 30
Road winning percentage .400 .476 −.076 26th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .462 .502 −.040 21st of 30
Longest winning streak 6 6 — 10th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 128 127 — 2nd of 30
Team Plate Appearances 4811 4816 −5 13th of 30
Team At Bats 4253 4278 −25 20th of 30
Team Runs 560 570 −10 18th of 30
Team Hits 1062 1042 +19 9th of 30
Team Doubles 202 197 +4 13th of 30
Team Triples 27 17 +9 2nd of 30
Team Home Runs 131 146 −15 23rd of 30
Team Runs Batted In 537 545 −8 18th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 130 86 +43 2nd of 30
Team Walks 431 429 +1 13th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1045 1064 −19 14th of 30
Team Walk Rate 9.0% 8.9% +0.1% 12th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 21.7% 22.1% −0.4% 14th of 30
Team Batting Average .250 .244 +.006 7th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .326 .318 +.008 6th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .402 .401 +.001 15th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .728 .719 +.009 9th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 64 63 — 13th of 30
Team Losses 64 63 — 14th of 30
Team Saves 29 33 −4 22nd of 30
Team Games 128 127 — 2nd of 30
Team Games Started 128 127 — 2nd of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1121.0 1129.0 −8.0 25th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.8 8.9 −0.1 21st of 30
Team Strikeouts 1056 1064 −8 18th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 8.5 8.5 — 15th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 3.4 3.4 — 14th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 3.96 4.17 −0.21 9th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".