Add SportsStats to your home screen

Miami Marlins

MIA · NL East · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 771 961 −190 11th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 12.6% 15.0% −2.5% 11th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -3.3 -2.9 −0.4 19th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 7 6 — 16th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 653 1111 −458 9th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 10.7% 16.5% −5.8% 11th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 5.9 4.9 +1.0 5th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 11.3 11.4 −0.1 12th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 15.8 15.8 — 15th of 30
Total position-player WAR 20.2 19.4 +0.8 13th of 30
Total pitching WAR 14.2 15.1 −0.9 18th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 55.9% 62.3% −6.4% 20th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.45 0.45 — 15th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 5 4 — 6th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 1 1 — 11th of 30
Hitters used 20 24 −4 27th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 26.3 28.3 −2.0 27th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 2290 1557 +732 7th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 37.3% 24.4% +12.9% 7th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 0 397 −397 19th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 27 32 −5 28th of 30
Rotation WAR 11.1 13.1 −2.0 21st of 30
Bullpen WAR 12.0 6.5 +5.5 4th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 7.9 8.8 −0.9 18th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 73.2% 71.5% +1.6% 14th of 30
Quality starts 47 56 −9 24th of 30
Blown saves 26 26 — 14th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential 3 0 +3 16th of 30
Run differential per game 0.02 0.00 +0.02 16th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.41 4.48 −0.07 18th of 30
Runs allowed per game 4.40 4.48 −0.08 13th of 30
Winning percentage .494 .500 −.006 15th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .502 .502 — 16th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation -1.3 -0.3 −1.0 18th of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .500 .499 +.001 15th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .455 .500 −.045 19th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .364 .510 −.146 25th of 30
Home winning percentage .580 .529 +.051 7th of 30
Road winning percentage .407 .471 −.064 24th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .462 .500 −.038 22nd of 30
Longest winning streak 6 6 — 13th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 162 161 — 1st of 30
Team Plate Appearances 6127 6128 −1 11th of 30
Team At Bats 5411 5444 −33 23rd of 30
Team Runs 715 725 −10 18th of 30
Team Hits 1347 1328 +18 9th of 30
Team Doubles 242 249 −7 19th of 30
Team Triples 37 22 +14 3rd of 30
Team Home Runs 168 185 −17 23rd of 30
Team Runs Batted In 685 693 −8 18th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 163 109 +53 4th of 30
Team Walks 552 544 +7 14th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1337 1356 −19 13th of 30
Team Walk Rate 9.0% 8.9% +0.1% 13th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 21.8% 22.1% −0.3% 14th of 30
Team Batting Average .249 .244 +.005 7th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .326 .318 +.008 5th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .400 .400 — 16th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .726 .719 +.007 9th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 80 80 — 15th of 30
Team Losses 82 80 +1 15th of 30
Team Saves 35 41 −6 24th of 30
Team Blown Saves 23 23 — 14th of 30
Team Games 162 161 — 1st of 30
Team Games Started 162 161 — 1st of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1428.1 1435.2 −7.1 27th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.8 8.9 −0.1 22nd of 30
Team Strikeouts 1323 1356 −33 18th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 8.3 8.5 −0.2 18th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 3.5 3.4 +0.1 17th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 4.09 4.17 −0.08 13th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".