Add SportsStats to your home screen

Houston Astros

HOU · AL West · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 352 926 −574 5th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 5.3% 14.6% −9.3% 5th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -1.4 -2.9 +1.5 6th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 4 6 −2 5th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 1751 1123 +627 25th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 28.8% 16.8% +12.0% 25th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 6.6 4.8 +1.8 3rd of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 14.1 11.3 +2.8 3rd of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 17.1 15.6 +1.5 9th of 30
Total position-player WAR 21.5 19.2 +2.3 8th of 30
Total pitching WAR 6.9 14.9 −8.0 27th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 65.6% 61.8% +3.8% 9th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.48 0.45 +0.03 12th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 3 4 −1 25th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 2 1 — 3rd of 30
Hitters used 28 24 +4 2nd of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 29.4 28.3 +1.1 6th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 1027 1547 −520 20th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 15.3% 24.4% −9.0% 21st of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 1464 395 +1068 2nd of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 33 32 — 10th of 30
Rotation WAR 5.2 13.0 −7.8 30th of 30
Bullpen WAR 1.2 6.2 −5.0 27th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 5.3 8.7 −3.4 28th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 75.5% 71.4% +4.1% 10th of 30
Quality starts 44 56 −12 26th of 30
Blown saves 14 26 −12 1st of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential -41 0 −41 20th of 30
Run differential per game -0.25 0.00 −0.25 20th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.50 4.48 +0.02 13th of 30
Runs allowed per game 4.76 4.48 +0.28 24th of 30
Winning percentage .497 .500 −.003 14th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .475 .502 −.027 20th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation 3.5 -0.3 +3.8 8th of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .455 .499 −.044 18th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .366 .500 −.134 26th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .467 .511 −.044 20th of 30
Home winning percentage .481 .528 −.047 21st of 30
Road winning percentage .513 .473 +.040 10th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .490 .500 −.010 16th of 30
Longest winning streak 6 6 — 13th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 161 161 — 1st of 30
Team Plate Appearances 6075 6094 −19 17th of 30
Team At Bats 5420 5413 +6 13th of 30
Team Runs 725 721 +3 13th of 30
Team Hits 1308 1320 −12 18th of 30
Team Doubles 236 248 −12 21st of 30
Team Triples 20 22 −2 15th of 30
Team Home Runs 225 184 +40 1st of 30
Team Runs Batted In 693 689 +3 13th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 50 109 −59 30th of 30
Team Walks 522 541 −19 19th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1334 1349 −15 15th of 30
Team Walk Rate 8.6% 8.9% −0.3% 18th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 22.0% 22.1% −0.1% 16th of 30
Team Batting Average .241 .244 −.003 20th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .314 .318 −.004 19th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .417 .400 +.017 4th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .731 .719 +.012 7th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 80 80 — 14th of 30
Team Losses 81 80 — 14th of 30
Team Saves 49 41 +7 4th of 30
Team Blown Saves 14 23 −9 1st of 30
Team Games 161 161 — 1st of 30
Team Games Started 161 161 — 1st of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1428.0 1427.2 — 15th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.9 8.9 — 2nd of 30
Team Strikeouts 1404 1349 +54 9th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 8.8 8.5 +0.3 9th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 4.1 3.4 +0.7 29th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 4.48 4.17 +0.31 24th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".