Add SportsStats to your home screen

Cincinnati Reds

CIN · NL Central · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 1379 737 +641 29th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 29.3% 14.8% +14.5% 30th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -5.2 -2.5 −2.7 30th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 8 5 +2 25th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 906 938 −32 20th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 18.0% 17.9% +0.1% 20th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 3.7 3.9 −0.2 14th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 7.1 9.0 −1.9 26th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 9.1 12.7 −3.6 28th of 30
Total position-player WAR 6.5 15.2 −8.7 30th of 30
Total pitching WAR 8.3 11.9 −3.6 22nd of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 109.2% 62.5% +46.7% 1st of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.34 0.42 −0.07 26th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 2 3 −1 24th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 0 0 — 14th of 30
Hitters used 21 22 −1 19th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 28.1 28.4 −0.3 20th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 1399 1150 +248 9th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 29.7% 23.1% +6.6% 9th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 379 313 +65 12th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 30 29 — 13th of 30
Rotation WAR 8.4 10.4 −2.0 23rd of 30
Bullpen WAR 1.0 4.0 −3.0 27th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 6.8 7.4 −0.6 19th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 59.7% 70.9% −11.2% 30th of 30
Quality starts 43 45 −2 18th of 30
Blown saves 18 20 −2 10th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential -89 0 −89 27th of 30
Run differential per game -0.71 -0.00 −0.71 27th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.04 4.48 −0.44 27th of 30
Runs allowed per game 4.75 4.48 +0.27 22nd of 30
Winning percentage .476 .500 −.024 22nd of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .427 .501 −.074 27th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation 6.2 -0.2 +6.4 2nd of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .618 .499 +.119 2nd of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .356 .499 −.143 27th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .692 .514 +.178 4th of 30
Home winning percentage .470 .525 −.055 24th of 30
Road winning percentage .483 .475 +.008 14th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .316 .501 −.185 29th of 30
Longest winning streak 5 6 −1 16th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 126 126 — 14th of 30
Team Plate Appearances 4713 4778 −65 25th of 30
Team At Bats 4180 4244 −64 28th of 30
Team Runs 509 565 −56 27th of 30
Team Hits 944 1034 −90 30th of 30
Team Doubles 181 196 −15 25th of 30
Team Triples 11 17 −6 24th of 30
Team Home Runs 163 145 +17 8th of 30
Team Runs Batted In 486 541 −55 27th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 87 85 +1 14th of 30
Team Walks 448 426 +22 8th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1199 1055 +143 29th of 30
Team Walk Rate 9.5% 8.9% +0.6% 7th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 25.4% 22.1% +3.3% 30th of 30
Team Batting Average .226 .244 −.018 30th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .305 .318 −.013 29th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .391 .401 −.010 23rd of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .696 .719 −.023 25th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 60 63 −3 22nd of 30
Team Losses 66 63 +2 21st of 30
Team Saves 32 32 — 17th of 30
Team Games 126 126 — 14th of 30
Team Games Started 126 126 — 14th of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1121.0 1120.0 +0.2 13th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.9 8.9 — 1st of 30
Team Strikeouts 1021 1055 −34 22nd of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 8.2 8.5 −0.3 21st of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 4.2 3.4 +0.8 28th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 4.48 4.17 +0.31 24th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".