Add SportsStats to your home screen

Chicago Cubs logo

Chicago Cubs

CHC · NL Central · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 206 736 −530 3rd of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 4.4% 16.2% −11.9% 3rd of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -0.5 -2.4 +1.8 2nd of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 1 5 −4 1st of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 1429 805 +623 27th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 25.9% 17.4% +8.5% 25th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 7.8 3.7 +4.1 1st of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 14.1 8.4 +5.7 1st of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 18.5 11.7 +6.8 1st of 30
Total position-player WAR 26.6 13.9 +12.7 1st of 30
Total pitching WAR 4.6 10.5 −5.9 26th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 53.0% 63.7% −10.7% 21st of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.45 0.41 +0.03 8th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 5 2 +2 1st of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 1 0 2nd of 30
Hitters used 19 21 −2 23rd of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 29.5 28.4 +1.1 6th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 978 1035 −57 13th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 20.7% 22.8% −2.1% 13th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 0 288 −288 19th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 36 27 +8 1st of 30
Rotation WAR 6.3 9.2 −2.9 24th of 30
Bullpen WAR 2.7 3.6 −0.9 22nd of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 4.8 6.7 −1.9 27th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 67.7% 70.4% −2.7% 18th of 30
Quality starts 36 40 −4 21st of 30
Blown saves 23 18 +4 23rd of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential 100 0 +100 4th of 30
Run differential per game 0.86 0.00 +0.86 4th of 30
Runs scored per game 5.13 4.49 +0.64 2nd of 30
Runs allowed per game 4.27 4.49 −0.22 10th of 30
Winning percentage .578 .500 +.078 5th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .583 .501 +.082 4th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation -0.6 -0.1 −0.5 19th of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .581 .500 +.080 6th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .703 .498 +.205 2nd of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .625 .515 +.110 7th of 30
Home winning percentage .593 .524 +.069 6th of 30
Road winning percentage .561 .476 +.085 5th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .545 .500 +.045 10th of 30
Longest winning streak 10 6 +3 2nd of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 116 115 3rd of 30
Team Plate Appearances 4576 4365 +210 1st of 30
Team At Bats 3982 3878 +103 3rd of 30
Team Runs 595 518 +76 2nd of 30
Team Hits 988 945 +42 5th of 30
Team Doubles 194 179 +14 8th of 30
Team Triples 20 15 +4 7th of 30
Team Home Runs 144 133 +10 9th of 30
Team Runs Batted In 558 495 +62 3rd of 30
Team Stolen Bases 86 78 +7 12th of 30
Team Walks 497 388 +108 1st of 30
Team Strikeouts 999 966 +32 21st of 30
Team Walk Rate 10.9% 8.9% +2.0% 1st of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 21.8% 22.1% −0.3% 14th of 30
Team Batting Average .248 .244 +.004 10th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .338 .318 +.020 2nd of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .415 .401 +.014 6th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .753 .720 +.033 3rd of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 67 57 +9 5th of 30
Team Losses 49 57 −8 5th of 30
Team Saves 25 29 −4 25th of 30
Team Games 116 115 3rd of 30
Team Games Started 116 115 3rd of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1037.2 1023.0 +14.1 3rd of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.9 8.9 1st of 30
Team Strikeouts 898 966 −68 24th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 7.8 8.5 −0.7 24th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 3.0 3.4 −0.4 4th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 4.05 4.18 −0.13 12th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".