Add SportsStats to your home screen

Boston Red Sox

BOS · AL East · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 1067 961 +105 19th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 15.0% 15.0% — 16th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -1.6 -2.9 +1.3 7th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 5 6 −1 8th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 191 1111 −920 1st of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 3.1% 16.5% −13.4% 1st of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 4.1 4.9 −0.8 21st of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 11.4 11.4 — 11th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 17.5 15.8 +1.7 8th of 30
Total position-player WAR 23.5 19.4 +4.1 6th of 30
Total pitching WAR 23.3 15.1 +8.2 4th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 48.5% 62.3% −13.8% 24th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.46 0.45 +0.02 13th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 5 4 — 6th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 2 1 — 3rd of 30
Hitters used 25 24 +1 8th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 28.7 28.3 +0.4 12th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 514 1557 −1043 30th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 7.2% 24.4% −17.2% 30th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 0 397 −397 19th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 31 32 −1 18th of 30
Rotation WAR 18.1 13.1 +5.0 6th of 30
Bullpen WAR 11.3 6.5 +4.8 6th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 11.3 8.8 +2.5 5th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 73.8% 71.5% +2.2% 13th of 30
Quality starts 64 56 +7 9th of 30
Blown saves 15 26 −11 2nd of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential 78 0 +78 7th of 30
Run differential per game 0.48 0.00 +0.48 7th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.25 4.48 −0.23 23rd of 30
Runs allowed per game 3.77 4.48 −0.71 3rd of 30
Winning percentage .537 .500 +.037 9th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .555 .502 +.053 7th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation -2.9 -0.3 −2.6 23rd of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .500 .499 +.001 15th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .587 .500 +.087 7th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .636 .510 +.126 6th of 30
Home winning percentage .506 .529 −.023 18th of 30
Road winning percentage .568 .471 +.097 4th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .481 .500 −.019 17th of 30
Longest winning streak 15 6 +8 1st of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 162 161 — 1st of 30
Team Plate Appearances 6112 6128 −16 16th of 30
Team At Bats 5414 5444 −30 21st of 30
Team Runs 689 725 −36 23rd of 30
Team Hits 1327 1328 −1 16th of 30
Team Doubles 285 249 +35 2nd of 30
Team Triples 26 22 +3 6th of 30
Team Home Runs 163 185 −22 26th of 30
Team Runs Batted In 658 693 −35 22nd of 30
Team Stolen Bases 107 109 −2 14th of 30
Team Walks 517 544 −27 21st of 30
Team Strikeouts 1326 1356 −30 12th of 30
Team Walk Rate 8.5% 8.9% −0.4% 20th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 21.7% 22.1% −0.4% 12th of 30
Team Batting Average .245 .244 +.001 13th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .319 .318 +.001 11th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .398 .400 −.002 19th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .717 .719 −.002 18th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 87 80 +6 9th of 30
Team Losses 75 80 −5 9th of 30
Team Saves 46 41 +4 7th of 30
Team Blown Saves 14 23 −9 1st of 30
Team Games 162 161 — 1st of 30
Team Games Started 162 161 — 1st of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1440.0 1435.2 +4.0 10th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.9 8.9 — 2nd of 30
Team Strikeouts 1398 1356 +41 11th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 8.7 8.5 +0.2 12th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 2.9 3.4 −0.5 3rd of 30
Team Earned Run Average 3.54 4.17 −0.63 3rd of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".