Add SportsStats to your home screen

Atlanta Braves

ATL · NL East · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 639 961 −322 9th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 10.1% 15.0% −5.0% 9th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -3.4 -2.9 −0.5 20th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 4 6 −2 5th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 1186 1111 +74 22nd of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 17.9% 16.5% +1.3% 21st of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 4.5 4.9 −0.4 16th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 11.8 11.4 +0.4 10th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 16.0 15.8 +0.2 12th of 30
Total position-player WAR 18.0 19.4 −1.4 21st of 30
Total pitching WAR 16.4 15.1 +1.3 12th of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 65.6% 62.2% +3.3% 11th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.37 0.45 −0.08 29th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 4 4 — 16th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 2 1 — 3rd of 30
Hitters used 25 24 +1 8th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 29.8 28.3 +1.5 4th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 1237 1557 −320 17th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 19.5% 24.4% −4.9% 17th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 471 397 +73 13th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 33 32 — 10th of 30
Rotation WAR 13.3 13.1 +0.2 14th of 30
Bullpen WAR 7.2 6.5 +0.7 12th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 10.0 8.8 +1.2 10th of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 76.5% 71.5% +5.0% 8th of 30
Quality starts 64 56 +7 9th of 30
Blown saves 21 26 −5 8th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential 116 0 +116 5th of 30
Run differential per game 0.72 0.00 +0.72 5th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.58 4.48 +0.10 9th of 30
Runs allowed per game 3.86 4.48 −0.62 5th of 30
Winning percentage .580 .500 +.080 4th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .577 .502 +.075 5th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation 0.5 -0.3 +0.8 14th of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .563 .499 +.064 9th of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .591 .500 +.091 6th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .571 .510 +.061 9th of 30
Home winning percentage .642 .529 +.113 3rd of 30
Road winning percentage .519 .471 +.048 9th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .635 .500 +.135 2nd of 30
Longest winning streak 8 6 +1 6th of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 162 161 — 1st of 30
Team Plate Appearances 6053 6128 −75 26th of 30
Team At Bats 5471 5444 +26 9th of 30
Team Runs 742 725 +16 8th of 30
Team Hits 1348 1328 +19 8th of 30
Team Doubles 251 249 +1 14th of 30
Team Triples 13 22 −9 29th of 30
Team Home Runs 204 185 +18 7th of 30
Team Runs Batted In 711 693 +17 8th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 83 109 −26 23rd of 30
Team Walks 465 544 −79 28th of 30
Team Strikeouts 1310 1356 −46 9th of 30
Team Walk Rate 7.7% 8.9% −1.2% 28th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 21.6% 22.1% −0.5% 10th of 30
Team Batting Average .246 .244 +.002 10th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .309 .318 −.009 28th of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .409 .400 +.009 6th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .718 .719 −.001 16th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 94 80 +13 4th of 30
Team Losses 68 80 −12 4th of 30
Team Saves 49 41 +7 4th of 30
Team Blown Saves 20 23 −3 8th of 30
Team Games 162 161 — 1st of 30
Team Games Started 162 161 — 1st of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1438.0 1435.2 +2.0 12th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.9 8.9 — 2nd of 30
Team Strikeouts 1350 1356 −6 15th of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 8.4 8.5 −0.1 16th of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 3.3 3.4 −0.1 12th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 3.63 4.17 −0.54 5th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".