Salt Lake Bees
SL · Pacific Coast League Pacific Coast League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 32 | 27 | +4 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 28.3 | 26.9 | +1.4 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1636 | 1526 | +109 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 33.6% | 34.9% | −1.3% | 14th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 176 | 78 | +97 | 8th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 38 | 37 | — | 12th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 82.0% | 71.8% | +10.2% | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 21 | 18 | +2 | 20th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -98 | 0 | −98 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.90 | 0.00 | −0.90 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.10 | 5.42 | +0.68 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 7.00 | 5.42 | +1.58 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .450 | .500 | −.050 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .437 | .501 | −.064 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 1.4 | -0.1 | +1.5 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .560 | .504 | +.056 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .340 | .500 | −.160 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .500 | .505 | −.005 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .508 | .519 | −.011 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .380 | .481 | −.101 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .483 | .502 | −.019 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 18th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".