Salt Lake Bees
SL · Pacific Coast League Pacific Coast League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 33 | 32 | — | 13th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 28.2 | 26.9 | +1.3 | 6th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2195 | 2176 | +18 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 33.8% | 35.4% | −1.5% | 18th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 176 | 105 | +70 | 9th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 47 | 45 | +1 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 76.0% | 73.8% | +2.2% | 12th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 32 | 27 | +4 | 22nd of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -73 | 0 | −73 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.49 | 0.00 | −0.49 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.14 | 5.31 | +0.83 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.64 | 5.31 | +1.33 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .453 | .500 | −.047 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .465 | .501 | −.036 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -1.8 | -0.1 | −1.7 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .559 | .503 | +.056 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .419 | .501 | −.082 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .533 | .507 | +.026 | 13th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .473 | .516 | −.042 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .432 | .485 | −.053 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .481 | .501 | −.020 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 6 | −1 | 20th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".