Round Rock Express
RR · Pacific Coast League Pacific Coast League East · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 32 | 32 | — | 18th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 27.5 | 26.9 | +0.7 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1280 | 2176 | −896 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 21.6% | 35.4% | −13.8% | 25th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 129 | 105 | +23 | 12th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 54 | 45 | +8 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 65.9% | 73.8% | −7.9% | 29th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 34 | 27 | +6 | 25th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -4 | 0 | −4 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.03 | 0.00 | −0.03 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.48 | 5.31 | +0.17 | 12th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.51 | 5.31 | +0.20 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .487 | .500 | −.013 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .498 | .501 | −.003 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -1.7 | -0.1 | −1.6 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .447 | .503 | −.056 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .500 | .501 | −.001 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .455 | .507 | −.052 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .413 | .515 | −.102 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .560 | .485 | +.075 | 4th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .481 | .501 | −.020 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 6 | −1 | 20th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".