Rochester Red Wings
ROC · International League International League East · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 27 | 32 | −5 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 25.7 | 26.9 | −1.2 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2841 | 2176 | +664 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 46.5% | 35.4% | +11.1% | 8th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 105 | −105 | 17th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 54 | 45 | +8 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 72.0% | 73.8% | −1.8% | 17th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 39 | 27 | +11 | 27th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 142 | 0 | +142 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.96 | 0.00 | +0.96 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.70 | 5.31 | +0.39 | 6th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.74 | 5.31 | −0.57 | 4th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .608 | .500 | +.108 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .584 | .501 | +.083 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 3.6 | -0.1 | +3.7 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .500 | .503 | −.003 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .652 | .501 | +.151 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .583 | .507 | +.076 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .608 | .516 | +.092 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .608 | .485 | +.123 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .603 | .501 | +.102 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 10 | 6 | +3 | 2nd of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".