Reading Fightin Phils
REA · Eastern League Eastern League Northeast · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 25 | 25 | — | 14th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 24.2 | 24.3 | −0.1 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2738 | 3342 | −604 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 62.4% | 74.9% | −12.5% | 27th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 1 | −1 | 3rd of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 29 | 32 | −3 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 66.2% | 66.6% | −0.4% | 14th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 10 | 19 | −9 | 1st of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -12 | 0 | −12 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.11 | -0.00 | −0.11 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.19 | 5.22 | −0.03 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.29 | 5.22 | +0.07 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .478 | .500 | −.022 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .491 | .500 | −.009 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -1.5 | 0.0 | −1.5 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .385 | .499 | −.114 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .424 | .498 | −.074 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .286 | .503 | −.217 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .527 | .519 | +.008 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .431 | .480 | −.049 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .487 | .501 | −.014 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 16th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".