Myrtle Beach Pelicans
MB · Carolina League Carolina League South · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 30 | 32 | −2 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 21.4 | 21.3 | +0.1 | 12th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 4790 | 5063 | −273 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.1% | +0.9% | 1st of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 1 | −1 | 3rd of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 42 | 44 | −2 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 82.6% | 64.2% | +18.3% | 1st of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 15 | 20 | −5 | 6th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -104 | 0 | −104 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.81 | 0.00 | −0.81 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 4.74 | 5.56 | −0.82 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.55 | 5.56 | −0.01 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .398 | .500 | −.102 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .428 | .502 | −.074 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -3.8 | -0.2 | −3.6 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .424 | .497 | −.073 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .400 | .502 | −.102 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .429 | .470 | −.041 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .469 | .538 | −.068 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .328 | .463 | −.135 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .395 | .500 | −.105 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 6 | −1 | 19th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the A clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".