Reynosa Broncos
REY · Mexican League Mexican League Madero · 2019Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 21 | 32 | −11 | 34th of 44 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 29.4 | 28.1 | +1.3 | 13th of 44 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1066 | 1534 | −468 | 29th of 44 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 24.8% | 29.4% | −4.6% | 27th of 44 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 89 | 387 | −298 | 27th of 44 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 33 | 32 | — | 21st of 44 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 67.7% | 71.3% | −3.6% | 31st of 44 |
|
| Blown saves | 19 | 19 | — | 18th of 44 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -164 | 0 | −163 | 43rd of 44 |
|
| Run differential per game | -2.16 | -0.01 | −2.15 | 43rd of 44 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.08 | 5.68 | −0.60 | 33rd of 44 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 7.24 | 5.69 | +1.55 | 42nd of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage | .355 | .500 | −.145 | 43rd of 44 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .343 | .500 | −.157 | 43rd of 44 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 0.9 | -0.0 | +0.9 | 13th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .375 | .504 | −.129 | 41st of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .258 | .499 | −.241 | 42nd of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .500 | .507 | −.007 | 18th of 44 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .357 | .519 | −.162 | 40th of 44 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .353 | .483 | −.130 | 38th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .423 | .506 | −.084 | 32nd of 41 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 3 | 5 | −2 | 44th of 44 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".