Jupiter Hammerheads
JUP · Florida State League Florida State League East · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 27 | 30 | −3 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 20.9 | 21.3 | −0.4 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 4354 | 4433 | −79 | 17th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.1% | +0.9% | 1st of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 1 | −1 | 3rd of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 43 | 39 | +3 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 54.9% | 64.2% | −9.3% | 28th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 16 | 17 | −1 | 16th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 13 | 0 | +13 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.11 | 0.00 | +0.11 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.40 | 5.57 | −0.17 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.29 | 5.57 | −0.28 | 10th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .509 | .500 | +.009 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .510 | .502 | +.008 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -0.1 | -0.2 | +0.1 | 14th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .576 | .498 | +.078 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .514 | .502 | +.012 | 12th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .333 | .479 | −.146 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .525 | .532 | −.006 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .491 | .469 | +.022 | 13th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .606 | .500 | +.106 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 6 | 6 | — | 13th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the A clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".