Greensboro Grasshoppers
GBO · South Atlantic League South Atlantic League North · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 22 | 24 | −2 | 21st of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 22.0 | 22.8 | −0.7 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 4178 | 3829 | +348 | 4th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 94.3% | +5.7% | 1st of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 1st of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 30 | 32 | −2 | 19th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 72.4% | 62.8% | +9.7% | 1st of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 18 | 16 | +1 | 21st of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 64 | 0 | +64 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.61 | 0.00 | +0.61 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.97 | 5.57 | +1.40 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.36 | 5.56 | +0.80 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .610 | .500 | +.110 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .542 | .501 | +.041 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 7.1 | -0.1 | +7.2 | 3rd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .571 | .499 | +.072 | 9th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .545 | .498 | +.047 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .667 | .509 | +.158 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .574 | .522 | +.052 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .647 | .479 | +.168 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .722 | .509 | +.213 | 1st of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 8 | 6 | +1 | 3rd of 30 |
|
Rank is among the A+ clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".