FCL Yankees
F-YAN · Florida Complex League Florida Complex League North · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 24 | 20 | +3 | 17th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 19.8 | 18.9 | +0.9 | 19th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2137 | 2137 | — | 35th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 98.9% | 99.2% | −0.2% | 61st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 31 | 26 | +4 | 21st of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 76.4% | 63.4% | +13.0% | 6th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 11 | 10 | — | 46th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 1 | 0 | +1 | 44th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.02 | -0.00 | +0.02 | 44th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.46 | 6.20 | +0.26 | 34th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.44 | 6.20 | +0.24 | 47th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .491 | .500 | −.009 | 42nd of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .501 | .503 | −.002 | 45th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -0.6 | -0.2 | −0.4 | 45th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .588 | .496 | +.092 | 17th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .526 | .500 | +.026 | 35th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .500 | .525 | −.025 | 30th of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .500 | .557 | −.057 | 51st of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .483 | .443 | +.040 | 33rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .491 | .501 | −.010 | 45th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 5 | −1 | 46th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".