El Paso Chihuahuas
ELP · Pacific Coast League Pacific Coast League East · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 29 | 28 | — | 13th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 28.3 | 26.9 | +1.4 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 205 | 1687 | −1482 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 3.8% | 35.1% | −31.3% | 30th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 84 | −84 | 16th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 39 | 40 | −1 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 62.5% | 72.6% | −10.1% | 29th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 34 | 21 | +12 | 29th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -99 | 0 | −99 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.83 | 0.00 | −0.83 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.18 | 5.41 | +0.77 | 4th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 7.02 | 5.41 | +1.61 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .412 | .500 | −.088 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .443 | .501 | −.058 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -3.7 | -0.1 | −3.6 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .375 | .502 | −.127 | 27th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .360 | .500 | −.140 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .364 | .514 | −.150 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .421 | .519 | −.098 | 26th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .403 | .481 | −.078 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .306 | .500 | −.194 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 5 | −1 | 24th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".