DSL Rojos
D-ROJ · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Central · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 17 | 20 | −3 | 48th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 17.9 | 18.9 | −1.0 | 69th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1965 | 2137 | −172 | 57th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 23 | 26 | −3 | 50th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 61.4% | 63.4% | −2.0% | 48th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 15 | 10 | +4 | 74th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -69 | 0 | −69 | 61st of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -1.25 | -0.00 | −1.25 | 61st of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.51 | 6.20 | −0.69 | 62nd of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.76 | 6.20 | +0.56 | 51st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .436 | .500 | −.064 | 54th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .407 | .503 | −.096 | 63rd of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 1.6 | -0.2 | +1.8 | 16th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .733 | .496 | +.238 | 5th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .280 | .500 | −.220 | 66th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .500 | .525 | −.025 | 30th of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .500 | .557 | −.057 | 52nd of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .370 | .443 | −.073 | 53rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .406 | .501 | −.095 | 59th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 7 | 5 | +1 | 15th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".