DSL Red Sox Red
D-RSR · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Northwest · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 15 | 20 | −5 | 70th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.3 | 18.9 | −0.5 | 46th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1765 | 2065 | −300 | 70th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 23 | 26 | −3 | 45th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 67.6% | 62.9% | +4.6% | 21st of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 12 | 9 | +2 | 59th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -61 | 0 | −61 | 61st of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -1.20 | 0.00 | −1.20 | 61st of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.76 | 6.21 | −0.45 | 51st of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.96 | 6.21 | +0.75 | 58th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .314 | .500 | −.186 | 75th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .415 | .503 | −.088 | 61st of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -5.2 | -0.2 | −5.0 | 81st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .308 | .494 | −.186 | 72nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .333 | .503 | −.170 | 63rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .523 | −.523 | 42nd of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .320 | .558 | −.238 | 77th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .308 | .442 | −.134 | 63rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .226 | .501 | −.275 | 80th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 2 | 5 | −3 | 74th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".