DSL Red Sox Red
D-RSR · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Northwest · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 15 | 20 | −5 | 71st of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.3 | 18.9 | −0.5 | 44th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1878 | 2137 | −259 | 68th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 23 | 26 | −3 | 50th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 67.2% | 63.4% | +3.8% | 26th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 14 | 10 | +3 | 66th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -72 | 0 | −72 | 63rd of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -1.33 | -0.00 | −1.33 | 63rd of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.72 | 6.20 | −0.48 | 52nd of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 7.06 | 6.20 | +0.86 | 62nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .315 | .500 | −.185 | 75th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .405 | .503 | −.098 | 64th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -4.9 | -0.2 | −4.7 | 77th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .357 | .496 | −.139 | 69th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .316 | .500 | −.184 | 64th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .525 | −.525 | 42nd of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .333 | .557 | −.224 | 75th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .296 | .443 | −.147 | 64th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .250 | .501 | −.251 | 78th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 2 | 5 | −3 | 74th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".