DSL Rays
D-RAY · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League North · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 14 | 20 | −6 | 71st of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.2 | 18.9 | −0.7 | 52nd of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1831 | 1910 | −79 | 43rd of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 18 | 25 | −7 | 72nd of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 53.2% | 62.2% | −9.0% | 66th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 14 | 8 | +5 | 75th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 26 | 0 | +26 | 31st of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.54 | -0.00 | +0.54 | 31st of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.96 | 6.22 | +0.74 | 19th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.42 | 6.23 | +0.19 | 47th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .479 | .500 | −.021 | 47th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .537 | .502 | +.034 | 32nd of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -2.8 | -0.1 | −2.7 | 71st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .222 | .492 | −.270 | 78th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .667 | .503 | +.164 | 18th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .533 | −.533 | 41st of 58 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .500 | .560 | −.060 | 55th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .455 | .439 | +.016 | 41st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .567 | .501 | +.066 | 28th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 3 | 5 | −2 | 61st of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".