DSL Padres Brown
D-PAB · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 13 | 20 | −7 | 80th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 17.7 | 18.9 | −1.2 | 79th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1768 | 2137 | −369 | 77th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 24 | 26 | −2 | 47th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 58.8% | 63.4% | −4.6% | 57th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 10 | 10 | — | 36th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -259 | 0 | −259 | 81st of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -4.71 | -0.00 | −4.71 | 81st of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 4.87 | 6.20 | −1.33 | 75th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 9.58 | 6.20 | +3.38 | 81st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .200 | .500 | −.300 | 81st of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .225 | .503 | −.278 | 81st of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -1.4 | -0.2 | −1.2 | 55th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .364 | .496 | −.132 | 67th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .115 | .500 | −.386 | 81st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .500 | .525 | −.025 | 30th of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .179 | .557 | −.378 | 81st of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .222 | .443 | −.221 | 74th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .206 | .501 | −.295 | 81st of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 2 | 5 | −3 | 74th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".