DSL Orioles Orange
D-ORO · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Central · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 16 | 20 | −4 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.2 | 18.9 | −0.7 | 54th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1955 | 2137 | −182 | 61st of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 18 | 26 | −8 | 77th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 53.9% | 63.4% | −9.5% | 72nd of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 10 | 10 | — | 36th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -8 | 0 | −8 | 48th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.15 | -0.00 | −0.15 | 48th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.55 | 6.20 | −0.65 | 60th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.69 | 6.20 | −0.51 | 35th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .436 | .500 | −.064 | 55th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .488 | .503 | −.015 | 49th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -2.8 | -0.2 | −2.6 | 69th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .444 | .496 | −.052 | 53rd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .444 | .501 | −.057 | 54th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .525 | +.475 | 1st of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .571 | .558 | +.013 | 39th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .296 | .442 | −.146 | 64th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .531 | .501 | +.030 | 39th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 29th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".