DSL Orioles Orange
D-ORO · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League Central · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 15 | 19 | −4 | 57th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 18.2 | 18.9 | −0.7 | 53rd of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1640 | 1848 | −208 | 59th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 18 | 25 | −7 | 71st of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 49.8% | 61.8% | −12.1% | 75th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 7 | 8 | −1 | 23rd of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -24 | 0 | −24 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.52 | -0.00 | −0.52 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.41 | 6.24 | −0.83 | 65th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.93 | 6.24 | −0.31 | 38th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .435 | .500 | −.065 | 55th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .458 | .502 | −.044 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -1.1 | -0.1 | −1.0 | 54th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .538 | .494 | +.044 | 32nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .375 | .503 | −.128 | 57th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | 1.000 | .533 | +.467 | 1st of 58 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .583 | .559 | +.024 | 38th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .273 | .440 | −.167 | 67th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .519 | .500 | +.018 | 42nd of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 26th of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".