DSL Braves
D-BRV · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League North · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 16 | 20 | −4 | 56th of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 17.8 | 18.9 | −1.1 | 77th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1788 | 2137 | −349 | 75th of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 26 | 26 | — | 38th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 75.2% | 63.4% | +11.8% | 7th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 10 | 10 | — | 36th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -132 | 0 | −132 | 77th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | -2.44 | -0.00 | −2.44 | 78th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 4.98 | 6.20 | −1.22 | 74th of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 7.43 | 6.20 | +1.23 | 71st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .278 | .500 | −.222 | 78th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .325 | .503 | −.178 | 77th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -2.6 | -0.2 | −2.4 | 68th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .455 | .495 | −.040 | 52nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .154 | .500 | −.346 | 80th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .000 | .525 | −.525 | 42nd of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .462 | .557 | −.095 | 66th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .107 | .442 | −.335 | 81st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .267 | .501 | −.234 | 76th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 1 | 5 | −4 | 81st of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".