DSL Blue Jays Red
D-BJR · Dominican Summer League Dominican Summer League South · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 12 | 20 | −8 | 81st of 81 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 17.8 | 18.9 | −1.1 | 76th of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 1832 | 2137 | −305 | 71st of 81 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.2% | +0.8% | 1st of 81 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 4th of 81 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 20 | 26 | −6 | 67th of 81 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 58.6% | 63.4% | −4.7% | 58th of 81 |
|
| Blown saves | 6 | 10 | −4 | 5th of 81 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 99 | 0 | +99 | 11th of 81 |
|
| Run differential per game | 1.90 | -0.00 | +1.90 | 10th of 81 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.10 | 6.20 | −0.10 | 42nd of 81 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 4.19 | 6.20 | −2.01 | 1st of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage | .654 | .500 | +.154 | 9th of 81 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .665 | .503 | +.162 | 6th of 81 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -0.6 | -0.2 | −0.4 | 45th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .412 | .495 | −.083 | 62nd of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .706 | .501 | +.205 | 14th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .750 | .525 | +.225 | 23rd of 61 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .640 | .557 | +.083 | 26th of 81 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .667 | .442 | +.225 | 5th of 81 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .656 | .501 | +.155 | 10th of 81 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 12 | 5 | +6 | 2nd of 81 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".