Columbus Clippers
COL · International League International League West · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 28 | 32 | −4 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 24.9 | 26.9 | −2.0 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 3628 | 2176 | +1451 | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 65.4% | 35.4% | +30.1% | 2nd of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 105 | −105 | 17th of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 40 | 45 | −5 | 25th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 69.7% | 73.8% | −4.1% | 21st of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 19 | 27 | −8 | 3rd of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 17 | 0 | +17 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.12 | 0.00 | +0.12 | 15th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.63 | 5.31 | +0.32 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.52 | 5.31 | +0.21 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .531 | .500 | +.031 | 11th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .509 | .501 | +.008 | 16th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | 3.2 | -0.1 | +3.3 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .472 | .503 | −.031 | 20th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .439 | .501 | −.062 | 22nd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .429 | .507 | −.078 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .597 | .516 | +.082 | 5th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .467 | .485 | −.018 | 18th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .556 | .501 | +.055 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 7 | 6 | — | 7th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".