Campeche Piratas
CAM · Mexican League Mexican League Hidalgo · 2019Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 21 | 32 | −11 | 34th of 44 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 29.1 | 28.1 | +1.0 | 15th of 44 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 938 | 1534 | −596 | 32nd of 44 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 21.2% | 29.4% | −8.2% | 31st of 44 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 531 | 387 | +143 | 16th of 44 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 29 | 32 | −3 | 30th of 44 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 73.5% | 71.3% | +2.2% | 15th of 44 |
|
| Blown saves | 21 | 19 | +1 | 24th of 44 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -3 | 0 | −2 | 24th of 44 |
|
| Run differential per game | -0.04 | -0.01 | −0.03 | 24th of 44 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 5.73 | 5.68 | +0.05 | 21st of 44 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.77 | 5.69 | +0.08 | 28th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage | .493 | .500 | −.007 | 26th of 44 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .497 | .500 | −.003 | 24th of 44 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -0.3 | -0.0 | −0.3 | 27th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .529 | .504 | +.025 | 14th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .536 | .499 | +.037 | 16th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .667 | .507 | +.160 | 10th of 44 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .567 | .519 | +.048 | 15th of 44 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .442 | .483 | −.041 | 27th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .535 | .506 | +.028 | 17th of 41 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 4 | 5 | −1 | 32nd of 44 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".