Burlington Royals
BUR · Appalachian League Appalachian League East · 2018Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 16 | 19 | −3 | 67th of 98 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 21.3 | 19.4 | +2.0 | 4th of 98 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 2649 | 2465 | +183 | 32nd of 98 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 100.0% | 99.7% | +0.3% | 1st of 98 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 2nd of 98 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 20 | 22 | −2 | 56th of 98 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 72.2% | 65.7% | +6.5% | 22nd of 98 |
|
| Blown saves | 8 | 9 | −1 | 27th of 98 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -72 | 0 | −72 | 81st of 98 |
|
| Run differential per game | -1.06 | -0.00 | −1.06 | 81st of 98 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 4.74 | 4.99 | −0.25 | 57th of 98 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 5.79 | 4.99 | +0.80 | 83rd of 98 |
|
| Winning percentage | .368 | .500 | −.132 | 85th of 98 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .409 | .500 | −.091 | 82nd of 98 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -2.8 | -0.0 | −2.8 | 82nd of 98 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .450 | .504 | −.054 | 66th of 98 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .316 | .494 | −.178 | 78th of 98 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .400 | .533 | −.133 | 67th of 94 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .364 | .528 | −.164 | 84th of 98 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .371 | .472 | −.101 | 77th of 98 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .237 | .501 | −.264 | 81st of 82 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 5 | 5 | — | 32nd of 98 |
|
Rank is among the Rk clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".