Asheville Tourists
ASH · South Atlantic League South Atlantic League South · 2026Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 32 | 28 | +3 | 7th of 30 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 23.2 | 22.7 | +0.6 | 6th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 4645 | 4863 | −218 | 24th of 30 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 89.2% | 94.9% | −5.7% | 25th of 30 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 0 | 0 | — | 1st of 30 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 37 | 36 | — | 13th of 30 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 54.9% | 65.0% | −10.1% | 29th of 30 |
|
| Blown saves | 27 | 21 | +6 | 27th of 30 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | -251 | 0 | −251 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Run differential per game | -1.93 | 0.00 | −1.93 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.04 | 5.55 | +0.49 | 8th of 30 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 7.97 | 5.54 | +2.43 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage | .331 | .500 | −.169 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .376 | .501 | −.125 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -5.9 | -0.1 | −5.8 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .417 | .497 | −.080 | 23rd of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .250 | .502 | −.252 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .308 | .513 | −.205 | 28th of 30 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .364 | .519 | −.155 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .297 | .481 | −.184 | 29th of 30 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .340 | .509 | −.169 | 30th of 30 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 8 | 6 | +1 | 4th of 30 |
|
Rank is among the A+ clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".