Nuevo Laredo Tecolotes
LAR · Mexican League Mexican League Madero · 2019Roster construction
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitters used | 19 | 32 | −13 | 37th of 44 |
|
| Plate-appearance-weighted batting age | 30.9 | 28.1 | +2.7 | 4th of 44 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 445 | 1534 | −1089 | 41st of 44 |
|
| Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under | 9.9% | 29.4% | −19.5% | 40th of 44 |
|
| Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older | 886 | 387 | +498 | 8th of 44 |
|
Staff shape
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitchers used | 21 | 32 | −11 | 41st of 44 |
|
| Share of innings thrown by starters | 61.9% | 71.3% | −9.4% | 39th of 44 |
|
| Blown saves | 18 | 19 | −1 | 11th of 44 |
|
Results
| Metric | Value | Lg avg | Diff | Rank | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run differential | 5 | 0 | +5 | 23rd of 44 |
|
| Run differential per game | 0.06 | -0.01 | +0.07 | 23rd of 44 |
|
| Runs scored per game | 6.76 | 5.68 | +1.08 | 4th of 44 |
|
| Runs allowed per game | 6.69 | 5.69 | +1.00 | 38th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage | .462 | .500 | −.038 | 29th of 44 |
|
| Pythagorean winning percentage | .504 | .500 | +.004 | 23rd of 44 |
|
| Wins above Pythagorean expectation | -3.3 | -0.0 | −3.3 | 39th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in one-run games | .500 | .504 | −.004 | 19th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in games decided by five or more | .500 | .499 | +.001 | 20th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage in extra innings | .429 | .507 | −.078 | 26th of 44 |
|
| Home winning percentage | .471 | .519 | −.048 | 33rd of 44 |
|
| Road winning percentage | .455 | .483 | −.028 | 26th of 44 |
|
| Winning percentage within the division | .531 | .506 | +.024 | 19th of 41 |
|
| Longest winning streak | 6 | 5 | — | 14th of 44 |
|
Rank is among the AAA clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".