Add SportsStats to your home screen

Philadelphia Phillies

PHI · NL East · 2026
See the full league board →

Roster construction

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 313 756 −443 5th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to sub-replacement hitters 5.5% 14.1% −8.5% 5th of 30
WAR bled by sub-replacement hitters -2.6 -2.6 — 16th of 30
Count of sub-replacement hitters 5 5 — 11th of 30
Batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 520 956 −436 8th of 30
Share of batters faced by sub-replacement pitchers 9.4% 16.9% −7.4% 8th of 30
WAR of the club's best position player 4.1 4.1 — 13th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best position players 10.7 9.7 +1.0 9th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's five best position players 14.6 13.4 +1.2 10th of 30
Total position-player WAR 15.6 16.3 −0.7 16th of 30
Total pitching WAR 20.4 12.6 +7.8 2nd of 30
Share of position-player WAR from the top three 68.6% 62.3% +6.3% 8th of 30
Concentration of WAR across the lineup 0.48 0.42 +0.06 4th of 30
Position players with a 2+ WAR season 4 3 — 10th of 30
Position players with a 4+ WAR season 1 0 — 5th of 30
Hitters used 20 22 −2 24th of 30
Plate-appearance-weighted batting age 30.6 28.4 +2.2 2nd of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 527 1252 −725 27th of 30
Share of plate appearances given to hitters 25 and under 9.3% 23.3% −14.0% 27th of 30
Plate appearances given to hitters 35 and older 384 337 +46 14th of 30

Staff shape

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Pitchers used 27 30 −3 24th of 30
Rotation WAR 14.9 11.0 +4.0 7th of 30
Bullpen WAR 6.5 4.3 +2.2 5th of 30
Combined WAR of the club's three best starters 12.9 7.7 +5.2 1st of 30
Share of innings thrown by starters 67.3% 71.1% −3.7% 22nd of 30
Quality starts 59 48 +10 5th of 30
Blown saves 21 21 — 13th of 30

Results

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Run differential 27 0 +27 10th of 30
Run differential per game 0.20 0.00 +0.20 10th of 30
Runs scored per game 4.54 4.46 +0.08 10th of 30
Runs allowed per game 4.34 4.46 −0.12 11th of 30
Winning percentage .559 .500 +.059 7th of 30
Pythagorean winning percentage .520 .502 +.018 10th of 30
Wins above Pythagorean expectation 5.3 -0.2 +5.5 3rd of 30
Winning percentage in one-run games .676 .499 +.177 1st of 30
Winning percentage in games decided by five or more .553 .500 +.053 9th of 30
Winning percentage in extra innings .583 .511 +.072 9th of 30
Home winning percentage .559 .528 +.031 10th of 30
Road winning percentage .559 .472 +.087 5th of 30
Winning percentage within the division .564 .503 +.061 7th of 30
Longest winning streak 9 6 +2 3rd of 30

Batting

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Games 136 136 — 8th of 30
Team Plate Appearances 5112 5152 −40 20th of 30
Team At Bats 4562 4575 −13 17th of 30
Team Runs 617 608 +8 13th of 30
Team Hits 1107 1114 −7 17th of 30
Team Doubles 196 210 −14 24th of 30
Team Triples 21 18 +2 9th of 30
Team Home Runs 162 155 +6 11th of 30
Team Runs Batted In 598 581 +16 9th of 30
Team Stolen Bases 96 92 +3 12th of 30
Team Walks 436 459 −23 22nd of 30
Team Strikeouts 1135 1137 −2 16th of 30
Team Walk Rate 8.5% 8.9% −0.4% 19th of 30
Team Strikeout Rate 22.2% 22.1% +0.1% 18th of 30
Team Batting Average .243 .244 −.001 17th of 30
Team On-Base Percentage .313 .318 −.005 22nd of 30
Team Slugging Percentage .401 .400 +.001 15th of 30
Team On-Base Plus Slugging .714 .718 −.004 18th of 30

Pitching

Metric Value Lg avg Diff Rank Percentile
Team Wins 76 68 +7 7th of 30
Team Losses 60 68 −8 7th of 30
Team Saves 36 35 — 16th of 30
Team Games 136 136 — 8th of 30
Team Games Started 136 136 — 8th of 30
Team Innings Pitched 1207.2 1207.1 — 12th of 30
Team Innings per Game 8.9 8.9 — 1st of 30
Team Strikeouts 1340 1137 +202 1st of 30
Team Strikeouts per 9 Innings 10.0 8.5 +1.5 1st of 30
Team Walks per 9 Innings 3.1 3.4 −0.3 6th of 30
Team Earned Run Average 4.07 4.16 −0.08 12th of 30

Rank is among the MLB clubs with a value for that metric, best first. Descriptive metrics (roster age, WAR concentration) are ranked but not colored — for them, "high" isn't "good".